The investigation targeting Patrick Poivre d’Arvor has changed its approach. The judges are now analyzing the rape charges against him as a whole to determine their possible serial nature, which would make it possible to circumvent their prescription.
The former star presenter of the TF1 television news, 74, is accused by around thirty women of rape, sexual assault and / or harassment. He vigorously denies them all and filed a complaint in return for slanderous denunciation. Several investigations have been launched.
A first investigation closed without further action because of the prescription of the facts
In June 2021, a first preliminary investigation, collecting the testimony of 23 women, was dismissed by the Nanterre prosecutor’s office (Hauts-de-Seine), mainly for prescription but also for “absence of a punishable offence” Where “insufficiently characterized offence”. A second is in progress, 7 other women having testified.
At the same time, a judicial investigation was opened after a complaint by the writer Florence Porcel, who accuses Patrick Poivre d’Arvor of having forced her to have sex in 2004 and fellatio in 2009.
The investigating judges responsible for this investigation had decided to immediately dismiss the facts of 2004 – appearing to be time-barred since 2014 – and to investigate those of 2009.
A choice rejected at the end of June by the Versailles Court of Appeal, which recalled that the limitation period, the period beyond which it is no longer possible to prosecute the perpetrator of an offense, was not inevitable.
A new investigation analyzes the possible serial nature of the facts to circumvent the prescription of the facts
The starting point of the prescription can indeed be postponed. In the event of an act of investigation, the starting point is no longer the date of commission of the facts but that of this act. Similarly, if there is a link between offenses – same author, modus operandi, goal or profile of victims – an interrupting act for one of these offenses can interrupt the prescription of another and set a new starting point for it.
The investigation into PPDA must therefore now verify whether the facts of 2004 have a close link with other non-prescribed offenses, according to explanations obtained by AFP.
The investigating judges have not yet heard from PPDA. But the latter had given his story during the preliminary closed investigation. On May 18, 2021, he denied having had any sexual relationship with Florence Porcel, accusing her of having “a lot of imagination”, according to the minutes of his hearing consulted by AFP. He had summed up their meeting in 2004, in his office at TF1, with a kiss.on the front”. Then “She slid her lips to mine“, he said, assuring that“there was not the shadow of a quarter of sexual intercourse”.
According to him, the one who was then a journalism student had contacted him by making him “proportion of health problems”. “Touched by his message”, he had him”phoned briefly“, says PPDA, who insisted to the investigators on his sensitivity since the suicide of his daughter. Florence Porcel, 21, had then attended his JT and would have him “asked to kiss her” in his office, says PPDA.
Florence Porcel, she denounced a non-consensual sexual intercourse, during which Patrick Poivre d’Arvor would have declared: “now you are a woman”. She described, in an interview with Le Parisien in 2021, a “state of total amazement” then dived”in denial“by persuading oneself to be “in love” not to “not collapse”.
Regarding the facts of 2009, she claimed to have said “Nope” Many times.
The testimonies point to a “similar modus operandi”
22 other women testified to rape, assault and/or sexual harassment between 1985 and 2003, mainly in the office of PPDA. The latter claimed not to remember several of them. “This name means nothing to me”, he repeated during his free audition. “What interest would all these women have in lying to us?“, asks a policeman. “Some people may be angry with me for having forgotten them” where are “perhaps transformed into militants“, replies PPDA.
The testimonials bring out “a similar procedure” with some “intimate matters” that PPDA is accused of having asked, also underlines the investigator: “Are you in a relationship?”, “faithful?”, “naked?”, “do you masturbate?”...
“Before entering into a relationship with someone, I need to know if this person is free and available. On other questions, I dispute them”, M. Poivre d’Arvor defends himself.
Testimonials “do not present you as a seducer but more as a sexual predator who obtains sexual favors by surprise”, investigators say. “It’s absolutely not me (…) I respect women”, PPDA defends itself, whose lawyer did not respond to AFP.
Counsel for Ms Porcel and other women declined to comment.